Posts Tagged ‘anxiety treatment boston’

Study finds that treatment of depression can increase work productivity. Get help for depression.

Friday, January 20th, 2012

Check out this study showing that depression negatively impacts productivity at work and that treatment of depression can improve performance and productivity at work. Another important point is that for many people, feeling like you are doing a good job at work can be a source of satisfaction that can help maintain a more positive mood.

If you are feeling down or depressed, effective treatment for depression including counseling and psychopharmacological treatment is available.

Excerpts from Study:

A new study from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health CAMH (in Canada) has found that employees with depression who receive treatment while still working are significantly more likely to be highly productive than those who do not. This is the first study of its kind to look into a possible correlation between treatment and productivity.

People who experienced a depressive episode were significantly less likely to be highly productive, the study showed. “We expected this, as past research has found that depression has adverse effects on comprehension, social participation, and day-to-day-functioning,” said Dr. Carolyn Dewa, Head of CAMH’s Centre for Research on Employment and Workplace Health and lead author.

“What’s exciting is we found that treatment for depression improves work productivity. People who had experienced a moderate depressive episode and received treatment were 2.5 times more likely to be highly productive compared with those who had no treatment,” she says.  “Likewise, people who experienced severe depression were seven times more likely to be high-performing than those who had no treatment.”

via CAMH: Study finds that treatment of depression can increase work productivity.

New Year’s Resolutions: Take Steps Not Leaps.

Saturday, December 31st, 2011

Change is hard. And, big changes can be especially hard to make and to maintain. So, if you are going to make a resolution for the New Year, think of something small that you would like to change and set a realistic goal.

By setting unrealistic goals, we set ourselves up for failure and can even make ourselves feel worse than we did before we set the goals. So, before you create a list of New Year’s resolutions to ring in 2012, try to think of just one small change that you would like to make AND that you think you can maintain for the long haul.

For example, rather than putting yourself through another all-out diet that will likely be difficult to maintain, choose a small change in your diet that can lead to better health. Giving up sugary beverages like soda might be a good option that could be maintained over time (and that likely would result in a marked reduction in caloric and sugar intake).

And, of course, if you want to make greater changes in your life for 2012, working with a psychologist and behavioral specialist can be a great option. Change is hard, but you don’t have to do it alone.

Good luck!

More Military Dogs Show Signs of PTSD, Need Psychotherapy of Sorts.

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

Other mammals, not just humans, can experience anxiety and stress. And, they can develop more severe forms of anxiety and stress such as PTSD. PTSD is an anxiety disorder that results from exposure to extreme stressors such as those often encountered in combat. Much like humans, animals need psychological treatment and behavior therapy to deal with the effects of stress and PTSD.

Excerpt from article:

The call came into the behavior specialists here from a doctor in Afghanistan. His patient had just been through a firefight and now was cowering under a cot, refusing to come out.

Apparently even the chew toys hadn’t worked.

Post-traumatic stress disorder, thought Dr. Walter F. Burghardt Jr., chief of behavioral medicine at the Daniel E. Holland Military Working Dog Hospital at Lackland Air Force Base. Specifically, canine PTSD.

If anyone needed evidence of the frontline role played by dogs in war these days, here is the latest: the four-legged, wet-nosed troops used to sniff out mines, track down enemy fighters and clear buildings are struggling with the mental strains of combat nearly as much as their human counterparts.

via More Military Dogs Show Signs of Combat Stress – NYTimes.com.

Laughter Produces Endorphins, Feel-good Brain Chemistry.

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

Laughing with others makes us all feel better – we experience a momentary elevation in our mood and our sense of feeling relaxed. But, scientists have long wondered why that is so. A recent series of psychological studies has illuminated some of the reasons laughter is good for us. And, our brains are behind it all.

Check out this excerpt from the NY Times. Link to full article is below.

Laughter is regularly promoted as a source of health and well being, but it has been hard to pin down exactly why laughing until it hurts feels so good.

The answer, reports Robin Dunbar, an evolutionary psychologist at Oxford, is not the intellectual pleasure of cerebral humor, but the physical act of laughing. The simple muscular exertions involved in producing the familiar ha, ha, ha, he said, trigger an increase in endorphins, the brain chemicals known for their feel-good effect.

His results build on a long history of scientific attempts to understand a deceptively simple and universal behavior. “Laughter is very weird stuff, actually,” Dr. Dunbar said. “That’s why we got interested in it.” And the findings fit well with a growing sense that laughter contributes to group bonding and may have been important in the evolution of highly social humans.

Social laughter, Dr. Dunbar suggests, relaxed and contagious, is “grooming at a distance,” an activity that fosters closeness in a group the way one-on-one grooming, patting and delousing promote and maintain bonds between individual primates of all sorts.

In five sets of studies in the laboratory and one field study at comedy performances, Dr. Dunbar and colleagues tested resistance to pain both before and after bouts of social laughter. The pain came from a freezing wine sleeve slipped over a forearm, an ever tightening blood pressure cuff or an excruciating ski exercise.

The findings, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, eliminated the possibility that the pain resistance measured was the result of a general sense of well being rather than actual laughter. And, Dr. Dunbar said, they also provided a partial answer to the ageless conundrum of whether we laugh because we feel giddy or feel giddy because we laugh.

“The causal sequence is laughter triggers endorphin activation,” he said. What triggers laughter is a question that leads into a different labyrinth.

Robert R. Provine, a neuroscientist at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and the author of “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation,” said he thought the study was “a significant contribution” to a field of study that dates back 2,000 years or so.

via Laughter Produces Endorphins, Study Finds – NYTimes.com.

Incoming search terms:

  • brain chemistry laughter
  • brain chemistry and laugh
  • how laughing is measured in newtons

Noise has negative impact on cognition and health. Psychologists have role in addressing problem.

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

A new article highlights the negative impact that exposure to noise has on cognitive development and health. Noise decreases learning among children who attend schools near trains and airports. Exposure to noise also increases blood pressure and is related to cardiac problems. The following is an excerpt from a recent article about the problem. A link to the full article is at the end of the excerpt.

Excerpt:

We’ve all been annoyed by a neighbor’s late-night partying or early-morning lawn mowing. But it turns out that living in a noisy neighborhood — particularly one plagued by train horns blaring or airplanes overhead — is more than exasperating. It might actually be deadly, according to a report released in April by the World Health Organization and the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.

A steady exposure to “noise pollution,” the report concludes, may lead to higher blood pressure and fatal heart attacks. The report analyzed a large number of epidemiological studies, most of which were conducted in Europe.

The report also confirmed what several psychologists have known for decades: Chronic noise impairs a child’s development and may have a lifelong effect on educational attainment and overall health. Numerous studies now show that children exposed to households or classrooms near airplane flight paths, railways or highways are slower in their development of cognitive and language skills and have lower reading scores.

“There is overwhelming evidence that exposure to environmental noise has adverse effects on the health of the population,” the report concludes, citing children as particularly vulnerable to the effects of chronic urban and suburban racket.

As air traffic increases worldwide and politicians consider building noise-producing wind turbines in more residential neighborhoods see “Noise isnt always loud”, the negative effects of noise will only continue to grow unless more is done to abate it, says environmental psychologist Arline Bronzaft, PhD, of the City University of New York. Her now-classic study from the 1970s was among the first to report the harmful effects of subway noise on children’s learning, and she has advised four New York City mayors on noise policy. New noise research in the United State has been scarce, however, since nearly 30 years ago federal funding for noise pollution research was cut after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Noise Abatement and Control was eliminated during the Reagan administration.

Still, Bronzaft says, as a matter of public health, psychologists must continue to stay involved in efforts to reduce environmental noise.

“Noise is a psychological phenomenon,” says Bronzaft, a contributor to the book “Why Noise Matters” 2011. “While the ear picks up the sound waves and sends it to the temporal lobe for interpretation, it’s the higher senses of the brain that determine whether that sound is unwanted, unpleasant or disturbing, and that’s why psychologists need to be heavily involved in this issue.”

Read full article at: Silence, please.

Incoming search terms:

  • cognition and health
  • nagetive impact on airplane
  • negative sound effects on psychology

Brain at higher risk from “real-world” ecstasy use.

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

By Kerry Grens

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – For a glimpse into real-world drug use, Australian researchers went to parties where people were using a drug known as ecstasy – and discovered that users’ brains were at far more risk from the drug than anyone had suspected.

The researchers also found that ecstasy pills often contain a variety of other drugs.

“What’s concerning is that most studies looking at toxicity in people or animals look at a single drug,” said Dr. Thomas Newton, a professor at Baylor College of Medicine, who was not involved in this study.

“We have no idea what happens when you start mixing like this.”

For this study, 56 people who had taken ecstasy at least five times in the past agreed to invite the researchers to house parties where they took ecstasy once again.

The researchers collected a sample of the pills and measured users’ blood levels of MDMA – the chemical that’s in ecstasy – every hour for 5 hours after people took the drug. At the end of the study, each user received AUS$200 (about US$205, or 128 GBP) for participating.

In some people, the amount of MDMA reached levels that cause injury or death in primates.

The researchers found that only half of the pills consisted entirely of MDMA. The other half also contained methamphetamine or chemicals related to MDMA: MDEA or MDA.

Some pills had no MDMA at all. The ones that did had amounts that ranged widely, from as low as 25 mg to ten times that amount.

“This highlights a significant public health concern, particularly regarding the existence of pills containing more than 200 mg of MDMA,” the authors write in their report of the study, which is published in the journal Addiction.

Because the research was intended to capture a realistic snapshot of ecstasy use, the number of pills people took over the course of an evening varied as well. Most users ingested more than one pill; some people took as many as five.

“Taking multiple pills is likely to lead to very high blood concentration, which may be harmful,” Dr. Rod Irvine, the lead author of the study, wrote in an email to Reuters Health.

That’s because concentrations of MDMA in users’ blood did not stop climbing during the 5 hours of sampling.

“We were surprised that the…concentrations continued to rise throughout the study,” Irvine, a professor at the University of Adelaide, said. “The higher levels are approaching those that have been shown to be damaging to brain cells in animal models.”

Three users had blood concentrations greater than 700 mg/L, which was poisonous to primates in laboratory studies. Another three users had concentrations very close to that level.

“Those are big numbers,” Newton said of the blood concentrations.

Irvine said that most users continued to take more ecstasy throughout the night, even though their blood concentrations from the initial pill had not peaked.

The authors speculate that users might develop a tolerance to the drug while they’re using it, making them feel less intoxicated even while their blood levels of the drug are increasing.

None of the users in the study suffered any immediate health problems from taking ecstasy.

According to the US National Institute on Drug Abuse, ecstasy can interfere with heart rate and temperature regulation and can cause brain damage.

Seven of every 100 twelfth-graders say they have tried ecstasy.

Irvine said that collecting data at parties is a valuable way to get a sense of what people are actually exposing themselves to.

For instance, in 14 people the amount of MDMA in the blood reached levels that had never been studied in humans in the lab.

In laboratory studies, ethical considerations prevent researchers from testing such high doses in people, so the amounts they experiment with “do not reflect the range used naturally,” Irvine wrote.

Regarding the information Irvine’s team collected, Newton said, “It’s very unique to pull that off.”

The research was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

SOURCE: bit.ly/gStlbA, Addiction, online February 14, 2011.

Better think positive: Pessimism can block therapy. Cognitive therapy might help.

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

Spine surgeon Anders Cohen puts a lot of stock in patients’ expectations of pain relief. He prefers to operate only on those who “grab you by the collar and say, `I can’t take it anymore.’”

New brain research proves doctors like Cohen are onto something: Pessimism can override the effectiveness of even powerful treatments.

You’ve heard of the placebo effect, the healing power of positive belief. This is the “nocebo” effect, the flip side, almost its evil twin.

And while the self-fulfilling prophecy of negative thinking isn’t nearly as well studied, some scientists say it’s time for doctors to start paying a lot more attention to their patients’ outlook.

“We all know that many treatments work for some people but not for others,” says neuroscientist Dr. Randy Gollub of Massachusetts General Hospital. Instead of stressing only the percentages, “say, `I have every reason to believe that you could be one of the people who will respond.’”

Scientists already know the placebo effect is real. They can measure it in studies that compare real drugs to dummy pills, where those given the fakes have noticeable improvements to pain and other symptoms.

But could a gloomy outlook really harm? British and German researchers performed the most sophisticated study yet to tell. They strapped a heat-beaming device onto the legs of 22 healthy volunteers, zapping it until people rated their pain at nearly 70 on a scale of 1 to 100.

Then the researchers hooked up an IV to give them the powerful morphine-like painkiller remifentanil. Typically used for surgery patients, it works rapidly but also is metabolized rapidly, able to be switched on and off as researchers alternated between giving the drug or plain fluid.

The volunteers’ brains were scanned as they described how much pain, and pain relief, they experienced at different times. When the researchers induced the burn and surreptitiously turned on the drug, the volunteers said their pain improved a fair amount. The painkiller was working, expectations aside.

Here’s the mind over matter: The researchers next told the volunteers they were about to inject the painkiller even though they’d never turned it off. Those pain ratings dropped even more — meaning expectations of relief doubled the drug’s painkilling benefit.

Finally, the researchers lied again, saying they were stopping the drug and that pain would probably increase. Sure enough, the volunteers’ pain levels soared back up to almost their pre-treated level as grim expectations canceled out the effect of a proven and potent painkiller. Anxiety levels fluctuated similarly.

Why? The brain scans tell the tantalizing tale — showing changes in neural pain networks that prove the people really did experience the changes in pain that they reported.

Moreover, expecting more pain fired up sections of the brain that control mood and anxiety, the researchers recently reported in the journal Science Translational Medicine. In contrast, anticipating pain relief fired up different regions previously found active in people given placebos.

It’s a small study, dealing just with pain. But the results may apply to a range of drug therapies, especially in chronic diseases because so many of those patients are conditioned by months or years or frustrating treatment failures, concluded lead researcher Dr. Ulrike Bingel of Hamburg’s University Medical Center, who teamed with Oxford University researchers for the study.

Learning how anxiety influences pain is crucial to understanding this nocebo effect — how you get the pain you expect, said co-author and Oxford neuroscientist Irene Tracey, in a recent review of the science of expectations in the journal Nature Medicine.

It’s by no means a novel concept. Previous research has found people given a dummy pill can experience the side effects of the medication they thought they were getting.

While there’s a lot yet to learn, for now doctors should at least try building closer relationships with their patients to encourage trust in recommended treatments, said Mass General’s Gollub.

“Building these strong, positive expectations for doing well are part of what comes from believing in your treater as someone who cares about you,” she said.

Directly managing patients’ expectations — spelling out exactly what will happen at different points to take away some of the fear — also can help, said Cohen, chief of spine surgery at Brooklyn Hospital Center in New York. He teaches new doctors not to promise surgery patients they’ll wake up free from pain because — while the old back pain may be fading — they’re going to hurt from the operation.

When someone says, “`Wow, it’s just like he told it was going to be, this guy told me the truth,’ now you’ve got this bond of confidence,” Cohen said. “You’re partnering with your patient.”

via Better think positive: Pessimism can block therapy – Boston.com.

Common Anxiety Disorders Make it Tougher to Quit Smoking Cigarettes. Anxiety and Panic Attack Treatments Available in Boston & Newton, MA

Sunday, October 31st, 2010

Researchers may have pinpointed a reason many smokers struggle to quit. According to new research published in the journal Addiction, smokers with a history of anxiety disorders are less likely to quit smoking.

To read more about the study, visit Common anxiety disorders make it tougher to quit cigarettes (Oct. 25, 2010).

Anxiety disorders are common but they often also respond very well to non-medicaion treatments including psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. If you would like to learn more about getting treatment for anxiety, give us a call or complete our simple online intake form.

New Anxiety Disorder Treatment; Parkinson’s disease treatment now used for treating Obsessive Compulsive Disorder ( OCD ).

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) involves placing electrodes in specific areas of the brain as a way to alter the functioning of that area. By altering functioning in specific brain areas, the symptoms associated with that brain region can also be altered. For many years, DBS has been used for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. However, researchers recently applied the technique among clients who have severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder that has not responded to usual treatments such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and medication (which are usually sufficient for most OCD patients).  The researchers reported that DBS treatment  resulted in significant improvement, generally reducing OCD symptoms by 50% or more. To view a related article, click here. The study is published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.

If you are experiencing anxiety symptoms or believe you may have an anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may be helpful. At CPA, we have many psychologists in Boston & Newton who are trained in CBT and who provide therapy for anxiety problems. To learn more, please visit our Anxiety & Panic Disorder Treatment page.

Incoming search terms:

  • ocd and parkinsons disease
  • parkinsons didease with ocd treatment
  • parkinsons disease and anxiety treatments